Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Summary. Modern domestic and foreign literature was analyzed to determine the tactics of surgical treatment of patients during the revision knee replacement. It was found that the use in clinical practice of a larger number of methods for compensating bone defects in revision knee replacement convincingly indicates the unresolved nature of this problem and the need for further scientific development, clinical research and observation. Using this or that method, it is necessary to take into account its advantages and disadvantages, as well as the specific clinical and physical characteristics of each patient.
References
Данные регистра эндопротезирования коленного сустава РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена за 2011−2013 годы / Н.Н. Корнилов, Т.А. Куляба, А.С. Филь, Ю.В. Муравьева // Травматология и ортопедия России. – 2015. –Т. 75, № 1. – С. 136–151.
Куляба Т.А. Ревизионная артропластика коленного сустава : автореф. дис. … д-ра мед. наук / Т.А. Куляба. – СПб. : РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена. – 2012. – 46 с.
Необъяснимая боль после тотального эндопротезирования коленного сустава / С. Паратте, Н.Н. Корнилов, Э. Тиенпонт [и др.] // Травматология и ортопедия России. – 2013. – Т. 70, № 4. – С. 92–96.
Новосёлов К.А. Травматология и ортопедия. Руководство для врачей. Повреждения и заболевания коленного сустава / К.А. Новосёлов, Н.Н. Корнилов, Т.А. Куляба. – СПб. : Гиппократ, 2006. – Т. 3, гл. 5. – С. 213-438.
Опыт применения в травматологии онкопротезов коленного сустава при обширных околосуставных костных дефектах / В. Мурылев, М. Холодаев, П. Елизаров [и др.] // Врач. – 2015. – № 1. – С. 64–68.
Принципы восполнения костных дефектов при реэндопротезировании коленного сустава / Т.А. Куляба, Н.Н. Корнилов, В.П. Румакин [и др.] // Ревизионная артропластика коленного сустава. – СПб. : РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена. – 2016. – С. 123–139.
Родионова С.С. Профилактика ранней асептической нестабильности эндопротезов крупных суставов. Клинический протокол / С.С. Родионова, А.Н. Торгашин. – М., 2013. – 20 с.
Румянцев Ю.И. Лучевая диагностика осложнений эндопротезирования тазобедренного и коленного суставов / Ю.И. Румянцев // Бюллетень сибирской медицины. – 2012. – Т. 11, № 2. – С. 51–55.
Способы компенсации костных дефектов при ревизионном эндопротезировании коленного сустава / Т.А. Куляба, Н.Н. Корнилов, А.В. Селин [и др.] // Травматология и ортопедия России. – 2011. – № 61. – С. 5–12.
Barrack R.L. Evolution of the rotation hinge for complex total knee arthroplasty / R.L. Barrack // Clin Orthop. – 2001. – № 392. – Р. 292–299.
Barrack R.L. Rise of the rotating hinge in revision total knee arthroplasty / R.L. Barrack // Orthopedics. – 2002. – № 25. – Р.1020–1028.
Bauman R.D. Limitations of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty / R.D. Bauman, D.G. Lewallen, A.D. Hanssen // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2009. – Vol. 467, № 38. – Р.18–24.
Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty / L.D. Dorr, C.S. Ranawat, T.A. Sculco [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1986. – № 205. – Р. 153–165.
Brooks P.J. Tibial component fixation in deficient tibial bone stock / P.J. Brooks, P.S. Walker, R.D. Scott // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1984. – № 184. – Р. 302–308.
Buck B.E. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus: an estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) / B.E. Buck, T.I. Malinin, M.D. Brown // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1989. – № 240. – Р. 129–136.
Clinical and radiological results of femoral head structural allograft for severe bone defects in revision TKA – A minimum 8-year follow-up / C.H. Chun, J.W. Kim, S.H. Kim [et al.] // Knee. – 2014. – Vol. 21, № 2. – Р. 420–423.
Cost of treating an infected total knee replacement / C.K. Hebert, R.E. Williams, R.S. Levy, R.L. Barrack // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1996. – № 331. – Р. 140–145.
Daines B.K. Management of Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty / B.K. Daines, D.A. Dennis // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2012. – Vol. 94, № 12. – Р. 1131–1139.
Distal femoral allograft reconstruction for massive osteolytic bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty / H.P. Bezwada, A.R. Shah, K. Zambito [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2006. – Vol. 21, № 2. – Р. 242–248.
Engh G.A. Classification and preoperative radiographic evaluation:knee / G.A. Engh, D.J. Ammeen // Orthop. Clin. North. Am. – 1988. – № 29. – Р. 205–217.
Engh G.A. Revision total knee arthroplasty / G.A. Engh, C.H. Rorabeck. – Philadelphia : Lippincott-Raven, 1997. – 459 р.
Engh G.A. Use of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss / G.A. Engh, D.J. Ammeen // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2007. – Vol. 89, № 12. – Р. 2640–2647.
Epidimiology of total knee replacement in the United States Medicare population / N.N. Mahomed, J. Barret, J.N. Katz [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2005. – Vol. 87, №.6. – Р. 61222–1228.
Exploration of radiographically normal total knee replacements for unexplained pain / M.A. Mont, F.K. Serna, K.A. Krackow, D.S. Hungerford // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 1996. – № 331. – Р. 216–220.
Gioe T.J. Why are total knee replacements revised? Analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry / T.J. Gioe, K.K. Killeen, K. Grimm // Clin Orthop. – 2004. – № 428. – Р. 100–106.
Gonzalez M.H. The failed total knee arthroplasty:evaluation and etiology/ M.H. Gonzalez, A.O. Mekhail // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. – 2004. – № 12. – Р. 436–446.
Haidukewych G.J. Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques / G.J. Haidukewych, A. Hanssen, R.D. Jones // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. – 2011. – № 19. – Р. 311–318.
Harada Y. Distribution of bone strength in the proximal tibia / Y. Harada, H.W. Wevers, T.D. Cooke // J. Arthroplasty. – 1988. – № 3. – Р. 167–175.
Huff T.W. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty / T.W. Huff, T.P. Sculco / J. Arthroplasty. – 2007. – Vol. 22, № 3. – Р. 32–36.
Implant selection in revision total knee arthroplasty / C.L. Nelson, T.G. Gioe, E.Y. Cheng, R.C. Thompson Jr. // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2003. – № 85. – Р. 43–51.
Intraoperative assessment in revision total knee arthroplasty / J.A. Rand, M.D. Ries, G.H. Landis, A.G. Rosenberg // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2003. – № 85. – Р. 26–37.
Lachiewicz P.F. Clinical and radiographic results of total condylar III and constrained condylar total knee arthroplasty / P.F. Lachiewicz, S.P. Falatyn // J. Arthroplasty. – 1996. – № 11. – Р. 916–922.
Long W.J. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up / W.J. Long, G.R. Scuderi // J. Arthroplasty. – 2009. – Vol. 24, № 7. – Р. 1086–1092.
Lotke P.A. Impaction grafting for bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty / P.A. Lotke, G.F. Carolan, N. Puri // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. –2006. – № 446. – Р. 99–103.
Mabry T.M. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty / T.M. Mabry, A.D. Hanssen // J. Arthroplasty. – 2007. – Vol. 22, № 1. – Р. 56–60.
Management of bone loss:structural grafts in revision total joint replacement / D. Backstein, O. Safir, A. Gross [et al.] // Clin Orthop. – 2006. – № 446. – Р. 104–112.
Management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty / J. Parvizi, T.D. Tarity, M.J. Steinbeck [et al.] // Bone Joint Surg. – 2006. – Vol 88, № 4. – Р. 175–181.
Meneghini R.M. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement / R.M. Meneghini, D.G. Lewallen, A.D. Hanssen // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2008. – № 90. – Р. 78–84.
Morgan D.F. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with bone allograft in 30 cases / D.F. Morgan, K.F. Franke, I. Nusem / Acta Orthop. Belg. – 2013. – Vol. 79, № 4. – Р. 427–434.
Munjal S. Revision total knee arthroplasty: planning, controversies and management-infection / S. Munjal, M.J. Philips, K.A. Krakow // Instr. Course Lect. – 2001. – № 50. – Р. 367–377.
Predicting total knee replacement pain: a prospective, observational study / V.A. Brander, S.D. Stulberg, A.D. Adams [et al.] / Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2003. – № 416. – Р. 27–36.
Preoperative characteristics of workingage patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty / T.H. Hylkema, M. Stevens, J. Van Beveren [et al.] // PloS One. – 2017. – Vol. 12, № 8.
Projections of primary and revision knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 / S. Kurtz, K. Ong, E. Lau [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2007. – Vol. 89, № 4. – Р. 780–785.
Radnay C.S. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems / C.S. Radnay, G.R. Scuderi //Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2006. – № 446. – Р. 83–92.
Rand J.A. Bone deficiency in total knee arthroplasty. Use of metal wedge augmentation / J.A. Rand // Clin. Orthop. – 1991. – № 271. – Р. 63–71.
Reconstruction of massive bone defects with allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty / M.T. Ghazavi, I. Stockley, G. Yee [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 1997. – Vol. 79, № 1. – Р. 17–25.
Reconstruction using femoral head allograft in revision total knee replacement:an experience in Asian patients / J.W. Wang, C.H. Hsu, C.C. Huang [et al.] // Bone Joint. J. – 2012. – Vol. 95, № 5. – Р. 643–648.
Revision total joint arthroplasty: dose Medicare reimbursement justify time spent? / M.A. Ritter, K.D. Carr, E.M. Keating [et al.] // Orthopedics. – 1996. – № 19. – Р. 137–139.
Rise M. Soft-tissue balance in revision total knee arthroplasty / M. Rise, S. Haas, R. Windsor / J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2003. – Vol. 85, № 1. – Р. 38–42.
Ritter M.A. Screw and cement fixation of large defects in total knee arthroplasty: a sequel / M.A. Ritter, E.M. Keating, P.M. Faris // J. Arthroplasty. – 1992. – № 8. – Р. 63–65.
Rubash E.H. Четыре самых тяжелых осложнения в эндопротезировании / E.H. Rubash // Ceranews. – 2014. – № 2. – Р. 6–9.
Scranton P.E. Jr. Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty / P.E. Jr. Scranton // J. Arthroplasty. – 2001. – № 16. – Р. 428–435.
Tantalum cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. A promising short-term result with 29 cones in 21 patients / M. Villanueva-Martinez, B. De la Torre-Escudero, J.M. Rojo-Manaute [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2013. – Vol. 28, № 6. – Р. 988–993.
Taylor M. Revision Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Massive Bone Loss and Periprosthetic Fracture Using a Total Femur Prosthesis: A Case Report / M. Taylor, G. Wood // Orthop. Muscul. Syst. – 2014. – № 3. – Р. 179.
The fate of augments to treat type-2 bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty / J.V. Patel, J.L. Masonis, J. Guerin [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. – 2004. – № 86. – Р. 195–199.
The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty / R.L. Barrack, T.R. Lyons, R.Q. Ingraham [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2000. – № 15. – Р. 858–866.
The use of structural allograft for uncontained defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. A minimum fiveyear review / M.G. Clatworthy, J. Ballance, G.W. Brick [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2001. – Vol. 83, № 3. – Р. 404–411.
Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty / H.C. Schmitz, W. Klauser, M. Citak [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2013. – Vol. 28, № 9. – Р. 1556–1560.
Treatment for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty / Y.Y. Qiu, C.H. Yan, K.Y. Chiu, F.Y. Ng / J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong Kong). – 2012. – Vol. 20, № 1 – Р. 178–186.
Treatment of severe bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty with structural allografts and porous metal cones – a systematic review / N.A. Beckmann, S. Mueller, M. Gondan [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2015. – Vol. 30, № 2. – Р. 249–253.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.