Integration of Mixed Reality Technologies into the Hip Joint Arthroplasty Technique
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

hip joint
total endoprosthetics
preoperative planning
computer navigation
mixed reality

How to Cite

Zubkov, O., & Torchynskyi , V. (2024). Integration of Mixed Reality Technologies into the Hip Joint Arthroplasty Technique. TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA, (1(120), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.37647/2786-7595-2024-120-1-27-33

Abstract

Summary. Background. This article is dedicated to analyzing the application of a mixed reality technology in total hip arthroplasty. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing need to enhance the accuracy and safety of surgical interventions, which ensure the restoration of joint functions and improvement of patients' quality of life.

Objective. The study focuses on the development and clinical testing of the mixed reality-based navigation system for positioning the acetabular component of the endoprosthesis.

Materials and Methods. The research includes simulation modeling and preclinical trials demonstrating significant advantages of the developed system compared to traditional methods.

Results. The main findings of the study showed a significant reduction in the average and maximum deviations of implant positioning angles, indicating increased accuracy and potential ability to reduce the risk of postoperative complications.

Conclusions. The research emphasizes the potential of integrating mixed reality technologies into orthopedic surgery, particularly in total hip arthroplasty procedures, contributing to the development of more efficient and safe surgical techniques.

https://doi.org/10.37647/2786-7595-2024-120-1-27-33
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

Wu KT, Lee PS, Chou WY, Chen SH, Huang YT. Relationship between the social support and self-efficacy for function ability in patients undergoing primary hip replacement. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 18;13(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0857-3

Ekelund A., Rydell N., Nilsson O. S. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 80 years of age and older. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1992, 281, 101-106. doi:10.1097/00003086-199208000-00017

Toonstra JL, Howell D, English RA, Lattermann C, Mattacola CG. The Relationship Between Patient Expectations and Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cartilage Repair of the Knee: A Mixed Methods Study. J Sport Rehabil. 2021 May 28;30(7):1038-1046. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2020-0022.

Cevallos N, Soriano KKJ, Flores SE, Wong SE, Lansdown DA, Zhang AL. Hip Arthroscopy Volume and Reoperations in a Large Cross-Sectional Population: High Rate of Subsequent Revision Hip Arthroscopy in Young Patients and Total Hip Arthroplasty in Older Patients. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(12):3445-3454.e1. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.017

Kohno Y, Nakamura T, Fujii M, Shin S, Hara T. A laser guide technique: a novel method for accurate acetabular cup alignment in total hip arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):18247. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21975-x

Callanan MC, Jarrett B, Bragdon CR, Zurakowski D, Rubash HE, Freiberg AA, et al. The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2019 469(2), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1487-1

Cho HS, Park MS, Gupta S, Han I, Kim HS, Choi H, et al. Can Augmented Reality Be Helpful in Pelvic Bone Cancer Surgery? An In Vitro Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Sep;476(9):1719-1725. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000233.

Burström G, Persson O, Edström E, Elmi-Terander A. Augmented reality navigation in spine surgery: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Mar;163(3):843-852. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04708-3.

Pieper S., Halle M, Kikinis R. 3D Slicer. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro. 2004;1:632-635. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2004.1398617.

Sugano N. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2013 Mar;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.1.

Brigham TJ. Reality Check: Basics of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017 Apr-Jun;36(2):171-178. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2017.1293987.

Ogawa H, Hasegawa S, Tsukada S, Matsubara M. A Pilot Study of Augmented Reality Technology Applied to the Acetabular Cup Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1833-1837. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.067.

Fotouhi J, Alexander CP, Unberath M, Taylor G, Lee SC, Fuerst B, et al. Plan in 2-D, execute in 3-D: an augmented reality solution for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2018 Apr;5(2):021205. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021205.

Su S, Wang R, Chen Z, Zhou F, Zhang Y. Augmented reality-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 2;18(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04421-0.

Singh V, Realyvasquez J, Simcox T, Rozell JC, Schwarzkopf R, Davidovitch RI. Robotics Versus Navigation Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Use of Technology Yield Superior Outcomes? J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2801-2807. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.074.

Shaikh HJF, Hasan SS, Woo JJ, Lavoie-Gagne O, Long WJ, Ramkumar PN. Exposure to Extended Reality and Artificial Intelligence-Based Manifestations: A Primer on the Future of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2023 Oct;38(10):2096-2104. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.015.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.