Peculiarities of Acromioplasty in Patients with Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Ruptures
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)


rotator cuff of the shoulder
subacromial decompression

How to Cite

Strafun, S., Bohdan, S., Yuriichuk, L., Strafun, O., & Biliavskyi, V. (2023). Peculiarities of Acromioplasty in Patients with Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Ruptures. TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA, (1(116), 10-17.


Background. According to the literature, from 14% to 28% of patients with rotator cuff tendon ruptures have unsatisfactory results of treatment and require a reverse shoulder joint arthroplasty in the future.

Objective: to compare the results of open rotator cuff repair of chronic massive rotator cuff tears in groups with standard subacromial decompression and subacromial decompression with resection of the lateral part of the acromion.

Materials and Methods. The study included 58 patients who underwent an open rotator cuff repair of chronic massive rotator cuff tears (supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons) and who underwent a rehabilitation program and follow-up up to 12 months after surgery. The age of the patients ranged from 30 to 60 years. All patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 – classic subacromial decompression, group 2 – classic subacromial decompression complemented by resection of 5 mm of the lateral end of the acromion. Shoulder joint function was assessed using the Constant Shoulder Score and VAS scales before surgery, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Results. Six months after surgery, the mean functional result on the Constant Shoulder Score scale in group 1 was slightly worse (24.5 ± 16.2 points) than in group 2 (18.5 ± 6.1 points); p = 0.131. Twelve months after surgery, the mean functional score on the Constant Shoulder Score was 21.1 ± 5.6 points in group 1 and 10.1 ± 6.1 points in group 2 (p = 0.031). Six months after surgery, the average score on the VAS scale was worse in group 1 than in group 2 and ranged from 3.5 ± 1.2 points. Twelve months after surgery, the mean score on the VAS scale was also worse in group 1 than in group 2 (p = 0.05). Conclusions. Resection of the lateral part of the acromion during the open rotator cuff repair of chronic massive rotator cuff tendons tears allows to obtain better average functional results of treatment both 6 months and 12 months after the surgery. Resection of the lateral end of the acromion changes the vector of the total force of the rotator cuff and deltoid muscles during shoulder elevation. This reduces the probability of the subacromial conflict syndrome development and thus reduces the load on the area of the rotator cuff tendon suture.
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)


Rockwood ChA, Masten FA. Rockwood and Matsen’s The Shoulder. 5th Edition. Elsevier. 2016. 1304 p. eBook ISBN: 9780323446686.

Kelly JD. Elite Techniques in Shoulder Arthroscopy. Springer, Philadelphia. 2016. 334 р. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25103-5.

McMahon PJ. Rotator Cuff Injuries A Clinical Casebook. Springer, Pittsburgh. 2017. 363 р. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63668-9.

Tauro JC. Stiffness and rotator cuff tears: incidence, arthroscopic findings, and treatment results. Arthroscopy. 2006 ; 22:581-586. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.03.004.

Itoi E, Arce G, Bain GI, Diercks RL, Guttmann D, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca AD, Sugaya H, Yoo YS. (Eds.) Shoulder stiffness: Current concepts and concerns. Springer. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-46370-3.

Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S. Classifications and Scores of the Sholder. Springer, Berlin. 2006. 297 р. ISBN 13: 9783540243502.

Cho NS, Rhee YG. Functional outcome of arthroscopic repair with concomitant manipulation in rotator cuff tears with stiff shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36:1323-1329. DOI: 10.1177/0363546508314402.

Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee HK, Jo KH, Bin SW, Gong HS. Moderate preoperative shoulder stiffness does not alter the clinical outcome of rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic release and manipulation. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24:983-991. DOI: 10.1016/j. arthro.2008.06.007.

Kim In-Bo, Jung Dong-Wook. A Rotator Cuff Tear Concomitant With Shoulder Stiffness Is Associated With a Lower Retear Rate After 1-Stage Arthroscopic Surgery Am J Sports Med 2018 Jul;46(8):1909-1918. DOI: 10.1177/0363546518768813.

Kang SW. Do we have to perform surgical treatment simultaneously for rotator cuff tear in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Korean J Sports Med 2019;37:11-6. DOI: 10.5763/ kjsm.2019.37.1.11.

Hyung-Seok Park, Kyung-Ho Choi, Hyo-Jin Lee, Yang-Soo Kim Rotator cuff tear with joint stiffness: a review of current treatment and rehabilitation. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2020 Jun; 23(2): 109–117. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2020.00143.

Kim YS, Lee HJ, Park I, Im JH, Park KS, Lee SB. Are delayed operations effective for patients with rotator cuff tears and concomitant stiffness? An analysis of immediate versus delayed surgery on outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:197–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.014.

Zaid MB, Young NM, Pedoia V, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Lansdown DA. Anatomic shoulder parameters and their relationship to the presence of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(12):2457-2466. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.008.

Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA, Sukthankar A, Gerber C. Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint? A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(7):935941. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31028.

McGrath JP, Lam PH, Tan MT, Murrell GA. The effect of concomitant glenohumeral joint capsule release during rotator cuff repair a comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25: 714. DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.005.

Park JY, Pandher DS, Moon GH, Yoo MJ, Lee ST. Comparison of surgical outcome in impingement syndrome with and without stiff shoulder. Indian Orthop. 2008; 42:182-187. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.40255.

Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Sukthankar A, Schmid MR, Gerber C. Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88(4): 800-5. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03042.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.