Abstract
Relevance. Dysfunction of the muscles of the posterior surface of the forearm leads to loss of extension in the wrist joint, metacarpophalangeal joints, and loss of abduction and extension of the first finger. The cause of dysfunction is damage to the radial nerve, supraclavicular or subclavian damage to the brachial plexus. The long regeneration process makes it impossible to effectively use the injured limb for a long period of time. Palliative use of movements (transposition) of muscles can significantly reduce the time for the patient to return to active use of the injured limb. Each of the muscle transpositions has certain disadvantages associated with the development of pathological locomotor phenomena (PLF) in the wrist joint. Ways to overcome them are based on a purely mechanistic approach, which is most often simplified to change the point of attachment of the primary non-functioning effector muscles.
Objective: to define most adequate complex surgical approach in restoring effective extension function in the wrist joint and metacarpophalangeal joints.
Materials and Methods. A retrospective analysis of the surgical treatment of 30 consecutive cases of dysfunction of the muscles of the posterior surface of the forearm caused by traumatic damage to the structures of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) of various localization was carried out. 23 patients with damage to the radial nerve. 7 patients with pathology of the brachial plexus. The mean age of patients was 41 years (from 18 to 64 years). Mean terms to primary surgical treatment were 4.6 months. 7 patients underwent only revision of the radial nerve within the segment (defect >10 cm); 6 patients underwent neurotization of the posterior interosseous nerve using the Mackinnon technique; 5 patients underwent autologous plasty of the radial nerve (defect <10 cm); 5 patients underwent its neurolysis. Neurolysis was performed in 6 patients with pathology of the brachial plexus, neurotization of the posterior interosseous nerve was performed in 1 case using the Mackinnon method. All patients underwent transposition of the forearm pronator teres (PT) according to the standard technique. Twelve patients underwent transposition of the flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR, 4 cases) or flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU, 8 cases) according to the standard technique. The results of transposition were analyzed after 1 month or later than 6 months, using a clinical neurological method. Regeneration of neural structures of PNS were analyzed within 9-12 months and additionally in terms later than 15 months both neurologically and electrophysiologically.
Results. In 6 patients, there was no restoration of extension in the metacarpophalangeal joints (EMPJ), in 12 patients there was a complete recovery of EMPJ after interventions on the structures of the PNS (4 cases – autologous plasty, 7 cases – distal neurotization, 1 case – neurolysis of the radial nerve). In 8 patients, the formation of PLF was not observed during extension in the wrist joint after muscle transposition. In 15 patients, PLF “type B” was formed, and in 7 patients, PLF “type C” was formed within 1 month after muscle transposition. In none of the patients, PLF “type C” was observed to be preserved for >6 months. In 8 patients, a permanent PLF “type B” was formed, which in 4 cases transformed into PLF “type D”. The formation of a steady-state PLF “type D” was recorded in all cases of neurolysis of the PNS structures without restoring extension in the metacarpophalangeal joints by the method of transposition. The formation of a steady-state PLF “type B” was recorded in all cases of FCU transposition to restore extension in the metacarpophalangeal joints. In 11 cases of reduction in the primary function of the FCR as a result of its denervation (neurotization according to the Mackinnon method) or transposition of the FCR muscles (change in the primary attachment point), PLF “type B” did not develop.
Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the most adequate complex surgical approach to avoid the formation of a stable PLF caused by muscle transposition to restore extension in the wrist joint is Mackinnon neurotization or FCR transposition to restore EMPJ.
References
Tordjman D, d’Utruy A, Bauer B, Bellemère P, Pierrart J, Masmejean E. Tendon transfer surgery for radial nerve palsy [published online ahead of print, 2021 Jul 31]. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021;S2468-1229(21)00189-DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2018.09.009.
Oberlin C, Chino J, Belkheyar Z. Surgical treatment of brachial plexus posterior cord lesion: a combination of nerve and tendon transfers, about nine patients. Chir Main. 2013;32(3):141-146. DOI:10.1016/j.main.2013.04.002.
Lowe JB 3rd, Sen SK, Mackinnon SE. Current approach to radial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(4):1099-1113. DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000020996.11823.3F.
Mahan MA, Warner WS, Yeoh S, Light A. Rapid-stretch injury to peripheral nerves: implications from an animal model [published online ahead of print, 2019 Oct 4]. J Neurosurg. 2019;1-11. DOI:10.3171/2019.6.JNS19511.
Cheah AE, Etcheson J, Yao J. Radial Nerve Tendon Transfers. Hand Clin. 2016;32(3):323-338. DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2016.03.003.
MERLE D’AUBIGNE R. Treatment of residual paralysis after injuries of the main nerves; superior extremity. Proc R Soc Med. 1949;42(10):831-844.
Tubiana R. Transferts tendineux pour paralysie radiale [Tendon transfer for radial paralysis]. Chir Main. 2002;21(3):157-165. DOI:10.1016/s1297-3203(02)00104-x.
Starr C. Army experiences with tendon transference. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1922;4:3–21.
Tsuge K, Adachi N. Tendon transfer for extensor palsy of forearm. Hiroshima J Med Sci. 1969;18(4):219-232.
Chuinard RG, Boyes JH, Stark HH, Ashworth CR. Tendon transfers for radial nerve palsy: use of superficialis tendons for digital extension. J Hand Surg Am. 1978;3(6):560-570. DOI:10.1016/s0363-5023(78)80007-0.
BOYES JH. Selection of a donor muscle for tendon transfer. Bull Hosp Joint Dis. 1962;23:1-4.
Brand PW. Tendon transfers in the forearm. In: Flynn JE, editor. Hand surgery, Baltimore. Williams & Wilkins; 1975. p. 189–200.
Стандартизация в нейрохирургии. Часть 6. Восстановительная и функциональная нейрохирургия. Под ред. академика НАМН Украины, проф. Е. Педаченко. Киев: ГУ “ИНХ НАМНУ”, 2020. 144 с.
Standardization is in neuro-surgery. Part 6. Restoration and functional neuro-surgery. Pod red. akademika NAMN Ukrainy, prof. Ye. Pedachenko. Kiyev: GU “INKH NAMNU”, 2020. 144 s. [in Russian].
Страфун СС, Борзих НО, Цимбалюк ЯВ. Оцінка ефективності лікування поранених із вогнепальними поліструктурними ушкодженнями верхніх кінцівок. Клінічна хірургія. 2018;85(7):62-66.
Strafun SS, Borzykh NO, Tsymbaliuk YaV. Evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment of wounded with gunshot polystructural injuries of the upper extremities. Klinichna khirurhiia. 2018;85(7):62-66. [in Ukrainian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.