Outcomes of Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Injury
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

Keywords

injury
sports injury
pectoralis major muscle
muscle damage
muscle suture
tendon suture
rehabilitation
refixation

How to Cite

Poliachenko, Y., Strafun, S., Kulyk, Y., & Lieskov, V. (2023). Outcomes of Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Injury. TERRA ORTHOPAEDICA, (3(118), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.37647/2786-7595-2023-118-3-32-39

Abstract

Background. The incidence of injuries to the pectoralis major muscle (PMM) is steadily increasing, necessitating an assessment of outcomes of surgical treatment.

Objective: to analyze the outcomes of surgical treatment for PMM injuries.

Material and Methods. The study is based on the analysis of surgical treatment outcomes of 84 patients with PMM injuries who were hospitalized in the Department of Microsurgery and Reconstructive Surgery of the Upper Extremity at the State Institution "Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine" from 2003 to 2023. The patients underwent a rehabilitation program and staged observation for up to 12 months after surgical intervention. The age of the patients ranged from 16 to 62 years; they were divided by age into three groups: up to 25 years, 25-40 years, and 41 years and older. Functional assessment of the PMM was performed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH), The Score and Subjective Evaluation by Patients with a Pectoral Major Tear (SEPPMT), and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scales at the time of admission, at 6 months, and at 12 months after the surgery.

Results. When comparing baseline functional parameters for acute and chronic PMM injuries using the Quick DASH, SEPPMT and ASES scales preoperatively, patients with acute injuries had worse results than those with chronic injuries (p < 0.001). At 6 months after surgical treatment, the group of patients with acute injuries showed significantly lower scores compared to the group with chronic injuries. At 12 months after surgical treatment, the group with acute injuries had significantly higher scores compared to the group with chronic injuries (p < 0.001), though still corresponding to excellent and good results.

Conclusions. When comparing baseline functional parameters for acute and chronic PMM injuries using the Quick DASH, SEPPMT, and ASES scales preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months after surgical treatment, patients who underwent surgery within two weeks after the trauma demonstrated better results. In cases of chronic injuries, the results were slightly worse, but still were close to good results.

https://doi.org/10.37647/2786-7595-2023-118-3-32-39
ARTICLE PDF (Українська)

References

Schepsis AA, Grafe MW, Jones HP, Lemos MJ. Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle. Am J Sports Med.2000 Jan;28(1):9-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465000280012701

Cruz L, Trueba V, Morales D, Gil O, Hernandez E, Acuna T, Ibarra P. Desinsercion distal del pectoral mayor traumatica aguda. Reporte de 19 casos con nuevo abordaje. Acta Ortop Mex. 2018 Nov;32(6):310-5. https://doi.org/10.35366/85619

Cruz L, Trueba V, Morales D, Gil O, Hernandez E, Acuna T, Ibarra P. Acute traumatic pectoralis major tendon ruptures. Case series with a new approach. Acta Ortop Mex. 2018 Nov;32(6):310-5 [in Spanish].

Hanna CM. Pectoralis major tears: comparison of surgical and conservative treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Jun;35(3):202-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.35.3.202

Lee YK, Skalski MR, White EA, Tomasian A, Phan DD, Patel DB, et al. US and MR imaging of pectoralis major injuries. RadioGraphics. 2017 Jan;37(1):176-89. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160070

ElMaraghy AW, Devereaux MW. A systematic review and comprehensive classification of pectoralis major tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012 Mar;21(3):412-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.035

Balazs GC, Brelin AM, Donohue MA, Dworak TC, Rue JP, Giuliani JR, et al. Incidence rate and results of the surgical treatment of pectoralis major tendon ruptures in active-duty military personnel. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(7):1837-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516637177

Marsh NA, Calcei JG, Antosh IJ, Cordasco FA. Isolated tears of the sternocostal head of the pectoralis major muscle: surgical technique, clinical outcomes, and a modification of the Tietjen and Bak classification. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1359-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.024

Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J. Measures of adult shoulder function: disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (quickdash), shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), american shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) society standardized shoulder. Arthritis Care Amp Res. 2011 Nov;63(S11):S174—S188. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20630

Wylie JD. Functional outcomes assessment in shoulder surgery. World J Orthop. 2014;5(5):623. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.623

Nute DW, Kusnezov N, Waterman BR. Functional outcomes and complications following pectoralis major tendon allograft reconstruction in a military population. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct;7(10):232596711987870. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119878709

Bak K, Cameron EA, Henderson IJ. Rupture of the pectoralis major: a meta-analysis of 112 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000 Mar;8(2):113-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050197

Bodendorfer B, McCormick B, Wang D, Conroy C, Fryar C, Kotler J, et al. Treatment of pectoralis major tendon tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative and nonoperative treatment. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;8(7_suppl6):2325967120S0041. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120s00411

Hanna CM. Pectoralis major tears: comparison of surgical and conservative treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Jun;35(3):202-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.35.3.202

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.